Claude
572b8acf8c
Make the library multi-platform without duplicating content. Each skills/<name>/SKILL.md body remains the single source of truth; a new generator renders platform-ready exports from it. - scripts/build-exports.mjs — dependency-free Node generator with a PLATFORMS registry so new platforms (Gemini, Cursor, …) are a few lines. Ships ChatGPT exports at exports/chatgpt/<bundle>/<skill>/SYSTEM_PROMPT.md (172 skills), plus generated index READMEs. Supports --platform and --check. - exports/ — generated ChatGPT system prompts, ready to paste into a Custom GPT. - .github/workflows/check-generated.yml — fails a PR if exports or web/skills.json drift from the source skills. - README "Works With" now documents the ready-to-use exports and regen command. - CHANGELOG + SKILL-AUTHORING-STANDARD note the generated artifacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px
76 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
76 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Contract Review Skill
|
|
|
|
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
- **Contract text or description** (paste or describe)
|
|
- **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
|
|
- **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
|
|
- **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### 1. Contract Overview
|
|
- **Type:** [Contract type]
|
|
- **Parties:** [Party A and Party B]
|
|
- **Effective date / duration:** [If stated]
|
|
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
|
- **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
|
|
|
|
### 2. Key Terms Summary
|
|
|
|
| Term | Detail |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Payment / fees | |
|
|
| Term and renewal | |
|
|
| Termination rights | |
|
|
| Liability cap | |
|
|
| IP ownership | |
|
|
| Confidentiality | |
|
|
| Dispute resolution | |
|
|
|
|
### 3. Flagged Clauses
|
|
|
|
For each flagged clause:
|
|
|
|
**[Risk level] — [Clause name]**
|
|
- **What it says:** [Plain English summary]
|
|
- **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication]
|
|
- **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
|
|
|
|
### 4. Missing Clauses
|
|
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Plain English Summary
|
|
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
|
|
|
|
### 6. Recommended Next Steps
|
|
- [Action 1]
|
|
- [Action 2]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
|
|
- [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
|
|
- [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
|
|
- [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
|
|
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Do not provide legal advice or suggest the review substitutes for qualified legal counsel
|
|
- [ ] Do not skip flagging unusual or one-sided clauses because they appear standard
|
|
- [ ] Do not omit a plain-English summary — legal jargon alone is not useful output
|
|
- [ ] Do not rate risk without explaining what specifically drives that rating
|
|
- [ ] Do not ignore missing clauses — absence of key protections is itself a risk
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
|
|
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
|
|
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
|
|
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"
|