v1.0
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "pm-product-strategy",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"description": "Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, and monetization.",
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"name": "Paweł Huryn",
|
||||
"email": "pawel@productcompass.pm",
|
||||
"url": "https://www.productcompass.pm"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"keywords": [
|
||||
"product-management",
|
||||
"strategy",
|
||||
"vision",
|
||||
"business-model",
|
||||
"swot",
|
||||
"competitive-analysis"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"homepage": "https://www.productcompass.pm",
|
||||
"license": "MIT"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
# pm-product-strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, and monetization.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This plugin provides 11 skills and 4 commands for product managers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Skills
|
||||
|
||||
- **ansoff-matrix** — Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product d...
|
||||
- **business-model** — Generate a Business Model Canvas with all 9 building blocks.
|
||||
- **lean-canvas** — Generate a Lean Canvas business model with sections for problem, solution, metrics, cost structure, UVP, unfair advan...
|
||||
- **monetization-strategy** — Brainstorm 3-5 monetization strategies with audience fit, risks, and validation experiments.
|
||||
- **pestle-analysis** — Perform a PESTLE analysis covering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors.
|
||||
- **porters-five-forces** — Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitu...
|
||||
- **pricing-strategy** — Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay esti...
|
||||
- **product-strategy** — Generate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas covering vision, segments, cost...
|
||||
- **product-vision** — Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams.
|
||||
- **swot-analysis** — Perform a detailed SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recomm...
|
||||
- **value-proposition** — Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template (Who, Why, What before, How, What after, Alternati...
|
||||
|
||||
## Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/pm-product-strategy:business-model` — Explore business models using Lean Canvas, Business Model Canvas, or Value Proposition frameworks
|
||||
- `/pm-product-strategy:market-scan` — Comprehensive macro environment analysis — SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, and Ansoff Matrix in one scan
|
||||
- `/pm-product-strategy:pricing` — Design a pricing strategy — models, competitive analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and pricing experiments
|
||||
- `/pm-product-strategy:strategy` — Create a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Strategy Canvas — from vision to defensibility
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/install pm-product-strategy
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or use directly:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cc --plugin-dir /path/to/pm-product-strategy
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Author
|
||||
|
||||
Paweł Huryn — [The Product Compass Newsletter](https://www.productcompass.pm)
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
MIT
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Explore business models using Lean Canvas, Business Model Canvas, or Value Proposition frameworks
|
||||
argument-hint: "[lean|full|value-prop] <product or business>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /business-model -- Business Model Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
Build and analyze business models using three complementary frameworks. Choose one or run all three for a complete picture.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/business-model lean Marketplace connecting freelance PMs with startups
|
||||
/business-model full Enterprise analytics platform
|
||||
/business-model value-prop AI writing tool for non-native English speakers
|
||||
/business-model all SaaS onboarding tool # runs all three
|
||||
/business-model # asks what you need
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Modes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Lean Canvas Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Best for: Early-stage ideas, startups, new product lines.
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **lean-canvas** skill to produce a complete Lean Canvas:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Lean Canvas: [Product]
|
||||
|
||||
| Problem (Top 3) | Solution | Unique Value Proposition |
|
||||
|-----------------|----------|------------------------|
|
||||
| 1. [problem] | [solution to each] | [single clear message] |
|
||||
| 2. [problem] | | |
|
||||
| 3. [problem] | | |
|
||||
|
||||
| Key Metrics | Unfair Advantage |
|
||||
|------------|-----------------|
|
||||
| [what you measure] | [what can't be copied] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Channels | Customer Segments |
|
||||
|---------|------------------|
|
||||
| [how you reach them] | [who, early adopters first] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Cost Structure | Revenue Streams |
|
||||
|---------------|----------------|
|
||||
| [fixed + variable] | [how you make money] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Riskiest Assumptions
|
||||
[What must be true for this to work — prioritized by risk]
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiments to Run
|
||||
[How to validate the riskiest assumptions cheaply]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Full Business Model Canvas Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Best for: Established products, strategic planning, investor materials.
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **business-model** skill to produce all 9 building blocks:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Business Model Canvas: [Product]
|
||||
|
||||
| Key Partners | Key Activities | Value Propositions | Customer Relationships | Customer Segments |
|
||||
|-------------|---------------|-------------------|----------------------|------------------|
|
||||
| [who helps you] | [core actions] | [why customers choose you] | [how you interact] | [who you serve] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Key Resources | | Channels | |
|
||||
|-------------|---|---------|---|
|
||||
| [what you need] | | [how you deliver] | |
|
||||
|
||||
| Cost Structure | Revenue Streams |
|
||||
|---------------|----------------|
|
||||
| [your costs] | [your revenue] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis
|
||||
[Strengths and weaknesses of this model]
|
||||
[How the pieces reinforce each other]
|
||||
[Vulnerabilities and dependencies]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Value Proposition Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Best for: Refining messaging, understanding user value, product-market fit analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **value-proposition** skill to produce a JTBD-framed value proposition:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Value Proposition: [Product]
|
||||
|
||||
### For [Segment]:
|
||||
1. **Who**: [target user profile]
|
||||
2. **Why**: [the job they're trying to do]
|
||||
3. **What Before**: [their current painful reality]
|
||||
4. **How**: [your solution approach]
|
||||
5. **What After**: [their improved reality]
|
||||
6. **Alternatives**: [what they'd use without you, and why you're better]
|
||||
|
||||
### Value Proposition Statement
|
||||
[One sentence: For [who] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit]. Unlike [alternative], we [differentiator].]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### All Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Runs all three frameworks and adds a synthesis section comparing insights across frameworks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow (All Modes)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Gather Context
|
||||
|
||||
Ask:
|
||||
- What is the product or business idea?
|
||||
- What stage? (idea, validated, scaling)
|
||||
- Any existing business model to refine?
|
||||
- Who is the target customer?
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Generate the Selected Framework(s)
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the relevant skill(s) as described above.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Save and Iterate
|
||||
|
||||
Save as markdown. Offer:
|
||||
- "Want me to **stress-test this model** with a SWOT or PESTLE analysis?"
|
||||
- "Should I **design a pricing strategy** for the revenue streams?"
|
||||
- "Want me to **build a strategy canvas** around this model?"
|
||||
- "Should I **identify the beachhead segment**?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Lean Canvas is best for speed and hypothesis testing — don't overthink it
|
||||
- BMC is better for mature businesses that need to articulate how everything connects
|
||||
- Value Proposition is the sharpest tool for product-market fit conversations
|
||||
- In "all" mode, highlight where frameworks agree (strong signal) and where they diverge (needs investigation)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Comprehensive macro environment analysis — SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, and Ansoff Matrix in one scan
|
||||
argument-hint: "<product, market, or industry>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /market-scan -- Macro Environment Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Run multiple strategic analysis frameworks to understand your competitive and macro environment. Combines SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, and Ansoff Matrix into a single strategic overview.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/market-scan EdTech market for corporate learning
|
||||
/market-scan [upload a market brief or strategy doc]
|
||||
/market-scan Our fintech product — preparing for board strategy review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Understand the Context
|
||||
|
||||
Ask:
|
||||
- What product, company, or market are you analyzing?
|
||||
- What's the purpose? (strategic planning, market entry, investor prep, annual review)
|
||||
- Any specific frameworks you want to focus on? Or run all four?
|
||||
- What's your current position in this market?
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Run the Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Apply four skills in sequence, each building on insights from the previous:
|
||||
|
||||
**SWOT Analysis** (apply **swot-analysis** skill):
|
||||
- Internal: Strengths and Weaknesses
|
||||
- External: Opportunities and Threats
|
||||
- Actionable recommendations for each quadrant
|
||||
|
||||
**PESTLE Analysis** (apply **pestle-analysis** skill):
|
||||
- Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental factors
|
||||
- Impact assessment and timeline for each factor
|
||||
|
||||
**Porter's Five Forces** (apply **porters-five-forces** skill):
|
||||
- Competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, threat of new entrants
|
||||
- Overall industry attractiveness rating
|
||||
|
||||
**Ansoff Matrix** (apply **ansoff-matrix** skill):
|
||||
- Market penetration, market development, product development, diversification
|
||||
- Risk-adjusted growth opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Synthesize
|
||||
|
||||
Cross-reference findings across frameworks to identify:
|
||||
- **Converging signals**: What multiple frameworks agree on
|
||||
- **Strategic imperatives**: Actions that appear critical across analyses
|
||||
- **Key risks**: Threats and forces to mitigate
|
||||
- **Growth opportunities**: Where the best risk-adjusted opportunities lie
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Generate Report
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Strategic Market Scan: [Market/Product]
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: [today]
|
||||
**Purpose**: [strategic planning / market entry / etc.]
|
||||
|
||||
### Executive Summary
|
||||
[5-7 sentences covering the strategic situation and key recommendations]
|
||||
|
||||
### SWOT Analysis
|
||||
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|
||||
|-----------|-----------|
|
||||
| [internal positives] | [internal negatives] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Opportunities | Threats |
|
||||
|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| [external positives] | [external negatives] |
|
||||
|
||||
**SWOT Actions**: [leverage S+O, mitigate W+T]
|
||||
|
||||
### PESTLE Analysis
|
||||
| Factor | Current State | Impact | Trend | Timeframe |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|--------|-------|-----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Porter's Five Forces
|
||||
| Force | Intensity | Key Drivers | Implications |
|
||||
|-------|----------|------------|-------------|
|
||||
|
||||
**Industry Attractiveness**: [High / Medium / Low]
|
||||
|
||||
### Ansoff Growth Matrix
|
||||
| Strategy | Opportunity | Risk Level | Investment | Priority |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Market Penetration | [specifics] | Low | [est.] | [H/M/L] |
|
||||
| Market Development | [specifics] | Medium | [est.] | [H/M/L] |
|
||||
| Product Development | [specifics] | Medium | [est.] | [H/M/L] |
|
||||
| Diversification | [specifics] | High | [est.] | [H/M/L] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-Framework Synthesis
|
||||
**Converging signals**: [what all frameworks agree on]
|
||||
**Strategic imperatives**: [must-do actions]
|
||||
**Key risks**: [highest-priority threats]
|
||||
**Best opportunities**: [risk-adjusted growth plays]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
1. [Recommendation with supporting evidence from multiple frameworks]
|
||||
2. ...
|
||||
3. ...
|
||||
|
||||
### Monitoring Plan
|
||||
| Signal | What to Watch | Source | Check Frequency |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|--------|----------------|
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Save as markdown.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Offer Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- "Want me to **build a product strategy** based on these findings?"
|
||||
- "Should I **analyze specific competitors** identified in Porter's analysis?"
|
||||
- "Want me to **design a pricing strategy** for the market penetration opportunity?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Use web research to ground the analysis in current market data, not just general knowledge
|
||||
- PESTLE factors should include specific regulations, market data, and trend signals — not generic observations
|
||||
- Porter's is most useful when you identify the *specific* forces, not just rate them abstractly
|
||||
- Ansoff should include concrete opportunities, not just generic "enter new markets"
|
||||
- The synthesis section is the most valuable part — it's where the frameworks talk to each other
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Design a pricing strategy — models, competitive analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and pricing experiments
|
||||
argument-hint: "<product or pricing question>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /pricing -- Pricing Strategy Design
|
||||
|
||||
Build a pricing strategy from first principles: analyze pricing models, estimate willingness to pay, benchmark against competitors, and design pricing experiments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/pricing SaaS project management tool moving from free to paid
|
||||
/pricing Should we switch from per-seat to usage-based pricing?
|
||||
/pricing [upload competitor pricing pages or current pricing data]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Understand the Pricing Context
|
||||
|
||||
Ask:
|
||||
- What is the product? What value does it deliver?
|
||||
- Current pricing (if any): model, price points, packaging
|
||||
- What's the trigger? (new product, pricing change, competitive pressure, growth stall)
|
||||
- Target customer profile and their budget context
|
||||
- Any constraints? (contractual obligations, market expectations, competitive positioning)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Analyze Pricing Models
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **pricing-strategy** and **monetization-strategy** skills:
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluate applicable models:
|
||||
- **Flat-rate**: Simple, predictable — best for commoditized products
|
||||
- **Per-seat/user**: Scales with adoption — best for collaboration tools
|
||||
- **Usage-based**: Aligns cost with value — best for infrastructure and API products
|
||||
- **Tiered**: Captures different willingness to pay — best for segmented markets
|
||||
- **Freemium**: Drives adoption — best for products with network effects
|
||||
- **Hybrid**: Combines models — best for complex products with multiple value levers
|
||||
|
||||
For each relevant model: pros, cons, fit for your product, revenue projection approach.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Competitive Pricing Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Using web research:
|
||||
- Benchmark pricing against 3-5 competitors
|
||||
- Identify pricing model patterns in the category
|
||||
- Note pricing trends (e.g., shift from per-seat to usage-based in B2B SaaS)
|
||||
- Find pricing page screenshots and data points
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Willingness to Pay Estimation
|
||||
|
||||
If the user has survey data or customer feedback:
|
||||
- Apply Van Westendorp analysis (if data available)
|
||||
- Segment willingness to pay by user type
|
||||
|
||||
If no data:
|
||||
- Estimate based on value delivered, competitive anchoring, and market norms
|
||||
- Design a willingness-to-pay survey the user can run
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Generate Pricing Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Pricing Strategy: [Product]
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: [today]
|
||||
**Current pricing**: [if applicable]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Model: [Model Name]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this model**: [rationale tied to product value delivery]
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing Structure
|
||||
| Tier | Price | Includes | Target Segment | Key Limit |
|
||||
|------|-------|---------|---------------|-----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Free / Trial Strategy
|
||||
[What's free, what's gated, conversion triggers]
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Benchmark
|
||||
| Competitor | Model | Price Range | Positioning |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|-----------|------------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Projections
|
||||
| Scenario | Assumptions | Year 1 ARR | Year 2 ARR |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
|
||||
| Conservative | [X] | [Y] | [Z] |
|
||||
| Expected | [X] | [Y] | [Z] |
|
||||
| Optimistic | [X] | [Y] | [Z] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration Plan
|
||||
[If changing pricing: how to transition existing customers]
|
||||
- Grandfathering approach
|
||||
- Communication plan
|
||||
- Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing Experiments
|
||||
| Experiment | What We're Testing | Method | Duration |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------------|--------|----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Risks and Mitigations
|
||||
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|
||||
|------|-----------|--------|-----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Metrics to Track
|
||||
- Conversion rate by tier
|
||||
- Average revenue per user (ARPU)
|
||||
- Upgrade/downgrade rates
|
||||
- Churn by price sensitivity
|
||||
- Price elasticity signals
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Save as markdown.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 6: Offer Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- "Want me to **create a monetization strategy** with alternative revenue models?"
|
||||
- "Should I **run a market scan** to validate pricing assumptions?"
|
||||
- "Want me to **draft customer communication** for the pricing change?"
|
||||
- "Should I **design the A/B test** for pricing experiments?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Pricing is the most powerful lever for revenue growth — a 1% improvement in pricing typically has 3-4x the impact of 1% improvement in customer acquisition
|
||||
- Value-based pricing always beats cost-plus — start from customer value, not your costs
|
||||
- The best pricing is simple to understand and predictable for the customer
|
||||
- Freemium only works if free users generate value (network effects, word of mouth, marketplace liquidity)
|
||||
- Always design a migration path for existing customers — pricing changes that alienate your base destroy trust
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Create a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Strategy Canvas — from vision to defensibility
|
||||
argument-hint: "<product or company>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /strategy -- Product Strategy Canvas
|
||||
|
||||
Build a complete product strategy document using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas. Covers vision, segments, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibility.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/strategy AI-powered design tool for non-designers
|
||||
/strategy [upload existing strategy doc, pitch deck, or business plan]
|
||||
/strategy # asks about your product
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Understand the Product
|
||||
|
||||
Accept context from:
|
||||
- Product description (verbal or written)
|
||||
- Uploaded documents (strategy decks, pitch decks, PRDs, business plans)
|
||||
- Existing strategy to refine or challenge
|
||||
|
||||
Ask key questions:
|
||||
- What does the product do? Who is it for?
|
||||
- What stage is it in? (idea, MVP, growth, mature)
|
||||
- What's the business model?
|
||||
- What triggered the need for a strategy document? (new product, pivot, annual planning, fundraise)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Build the Strategy Canvas
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **product-strategy** and **product-vision** skills:
|
||||
|
||||
Work through all 9 sections of the Strategy Canvas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Vision**: Inspiring north star that motivates the team
|
||||
2. **Target Segments**: Who you serve (and who you don't)
|
||||
3. **Pain Points & Value**: Problems you solve and the value you create
|
||||
4. **Value Propositions**: JTBD-framed value for each segment
|
||||
5. **Strategic Trade-offs**: What you choose NOT to do (as important as what you do)
|
||||
6. **Key Metrics**: How you measure success
|
||||
7. **Growth Engine**: How you acquire and expand users
|
||||
8. **Core Capabilities**: What you need to build and maintain
|
||||
9. **Defensibility**: What makes this hard to copy (network effects, data, brand, switching costs)
|
||||
|
||||
For each section, provide specific content — not generic advice.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Generate Strategy Document
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Product Strategy: [Product Name]
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: [today]
|
||||
**Stage**: [idea / MVP / growth / mature]
|
||||
**Author**: [user]
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Vision
|
||||
[Inspiring, achievable, emotional — 2-3 sentences max]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Target Segments
|
||||
| Segment | Size | Pain Level | Current Alternative | Priority |
|
||||
|---------|------|-----------|-------------------|----------|
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary segment**: [who and why]
|
||||
**Explicitly not serving**: [who and why]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Pain Points & Value Created
|
||||
[For each segment: the problem, current cost, and value your solution delivers]
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Value Propositions
|
||||
**For [Segment A]**: When [situation], they want [motivation], so they can [outcome]
|
||||
**For [Segment B]**: When [situation], they want [motivation], so they can [outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Strategic Trade-offs
|
||||
| We Choose | Over | Because |
|
||||
|-----------|------|---------|
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Key Metrics
|
||||
- **North Star**: [metric]
|
||||
- **Input Metrics**: [3-5 levers]
|
||||
- **Health Metrics**: [guardrails]
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Growth Engine
|
||||
[How you acquire, activate, and expand — specific mechanisms, not generic]
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Core Capabilities
|
||||
| Capability | Build / Buy / Partner | Investment Level | Timeline |
|
||||
|-----------|---------------------|-----------------|----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Defensibility
|
||||
[What creates a moat — be specific about which type: network effects, data, brand, switching costs, economies of scale]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Risks
|
||||
[Top 3 things that could invalidate this strategy]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
[What to do with this strategy — socialize, test, build]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Save as markdown.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Offer Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- "Want me to **build a Lean Canvas** or **Business Model Canvas** for this?"
|
||||
- "Should I **create a roadmap** aligned to this strategy?"
|
||||
- "Want me to **run a macro environment scan** to stress-test assumptions?"
|
||||
- "Should I **define OKRs** based on Section 6?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- A good strategy is more about what you say NO to than what you say YES to — push hard on trade-offs
|
||||
- Vision should be emotional and memorable, not a corporate statement
|
||||
- Defensibility is the hardest section — most products don't have a real moat yet, and that's OK to acknowledge
|
||||
- If the product is early-stage, some sections will be hypotheses — label them as such
|
||||
- Strategy should fit on one page for executives — offer a condensed version
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ansoff-matrix
|
||||
description: "Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. Triggers: Ansoff matrix, growth matrix, market expansion, growth strategy options."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Ansoff Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: ansoff-matrix
|
||||
- **Description**: Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: Ansoff matrix, growth matrix, market expansion, growth strategy options
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a growth strategist analyzing expansion opportunities using the Ansoff Matrix for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to evaluate growth options across product and market dimensions and develop specific strategies for each quadrant.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Current product(s) and market definition
|
||||
- Current market penetration and performance
|
||||
- Customer insights and market opportunities
|
||||
- Company capabilities and constraints
|
||||
- Growth targets and timelines
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
## Ansoff Matrix Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 2x2 Matrix: Products vs. Markets
|
||||
|
||||
| | Current Market | New Market |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Current Product** | Market Penetration | Market Development |
|
||||
| **New Product** | Product Development | Diversification |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Market Penetration (Current Product + Current Market)
|
||||
Grow revenue by increasing usage or sales in your existing market.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies:**
|
||||
- Increase frequency of product usage
|
||||
- Expand use cases within existing customer base
|
||||
- Acquire competitors' customers
|
||||
- Reduce churn and improve retention
|
||||
- Upsell and cross-sell existing customers
|
||||
- Lower prices to capture price-sensitive segments
|
||||
- Increase marketing and brand awareness
|
||||
- Improve customer experience to drive referrals
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Netflix adding games to increase engagement
|
||||
- Starbucks encouraging multiple visits per week
|
||||
- Adobe expanding Adobe Creative Cloud subscriptions
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Level:** Low (familiar market, product, capabilities)
|
||||
|
||||
**Typical Timeline:** 6-12 months
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Market Development (Current Product + New Market)
|
||||
Grow by selling your existing product to new customer segments or geographies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies:**
|
||||
- Expand into new geographies or regions
|
||||
- Target new customer segments or personas
|
||||
- Sell through new channels or partnerships
|
||||
- Adapt product for new use cases
|
||||
- Partner with complementary companies
|
||||
- Localize product for new markets
|
||||
- Build brand awareness in new markets
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Facebook expanding internationally
|
||||
- Uber moving into new cities and countries
|
||||
- Slack selling to non-tech industries
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Level:** Medium (new market dynamics, but proven product)
|
||||
|
||||
**Typical Timeline:** 12-24 months
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Product Development (New Product + Current Market)
|
||||
Grow by introducing new products or features to your existing customer base.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies:**
|
||||
- Add new features to existing product
|
||||
- Create adjacent product lines
|
||||
- Bundle products for greater value
|
||||
- Develop premium/lite versions
|
||||
- Integrate adjacent capabilities
|
||||
- Create complementary products
|
||||
- Upgrade product experience or performance
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Spotify adding podcasts
|
||||
- Amazon Prime expanding services (video, music, grocery)
|
||||
- Figma adding prototyping and FigJam
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Level:** Medium (existing customers but new product)
|
||||
|
||||
**Typical Timeline:** 12-18 months
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Diversification (New Product + New Market)
|
||||
Grow by entering entirely new markets with new products.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies:**
|
||||
- Related diversification: leveraging existing competencies
|
||||
- Unrelated diversification: entering new domains
|
||||
- Acquire companies in new markets/products
|
||||
- Strategic partnerships or joint ventures
|
||||
- Build new business units
|
||||
- Apply capabilities to adjacent problems
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Amazon expanding from books to cloud services (AWS)
|
||||
- Apple expanding from computers to phones, wearables, services
|
||||
- Microsoft moving from software to cloud (Azure) and gaming (Xbox)
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Level:** High (new market, new product, new capabilities)
|
||||
|
||||
**Typical Timeline:** 24+ months, requires significant investment
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Define current market and product clearly
|
||||
2. Analyze each quadrant:
|
||||
- Identify 2-3 specific opportunities per quadrant
|
||||
- Assess market size and growth potential
|
||||
- Estimate required resources and investment
|
||||
- Evaluate competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Define success metrics
|
||||
3. Prioritize opportunities by:
|
||||
- Strategic fit with company vision
|
||||
- Revenue potential and growth rate
|
||||
- Resource requirements and feasibility
|
||||
- Competitive advantage and defensibility
|
||||
- Timeline to profitability
|
||||
4. Develop go-to-market strategy for top 2-3 opportunities
|
||||
5. Create phased roadmap and milestones
|
||||
6. Identify risks and mitigation plans
|
||||
7. Define success metrics and leading indicators
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Questions
|
||||
- Which quadrant offers the best risk-reward profile?
|
||||
- Where do our capabilities give us competitive advantage?
|
||||
- Which opportunities align best with our vision and values?
|
||||
- What partnerships or acquisitions would accelerate growth?
|
||||
- How does each option impact our brand and positioning?
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Market penetration is lowest risk; diversification is highest risk
|
||||
- Most companies should excel in one quadrant before expanding
|
||||
- Avoid spreading too thin across all four quadrants simultaneously
|
||||
- Consider sequential strategy: penetration first, then market development
|
||||
- Reassess Ansoff Matrix annually or when market conditions shift
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: business-model
|
||||
description: "Generate a Business Model Canvas with all 9 building blocks. Use when creating a business model or analyzing how a business creates value. Triggers: business model canvas, BMC, business model."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Business Model Canvas
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: business-model
|
||||
- **Description**: Generate a Business Model Canvas with all 9 building blocks. Use when creating a business model, documenting how a business creates value, or analyzing an existing business model.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: business model canvas, BMC, business model, how we make money
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a business model strategist designing a Business Model Canvas for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to create a comprehensive Business Model Canvas that outlines how the business creates, delivers, and captures value.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product or service description
|
||||
- Target customer(s) and market
|
||||
- Current business operations or assumptions
|
||||
- Competitive context or industry dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Model Canvas Template
|
||||
|
||||
### Left Side: Creating Value
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Key Partners**
|
||||
- Who are the key strategic partners and suppliers?
|
||||
- What partnerships enable our business model?
|
||||
- Which activities do partners handle?
|
||||
- Are there joint ventures or co-creation opportunities?
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Key Activities**
|
||||
- What key activities does the business perform?
|
||||
- What processes are critical to delivering value?
|
||||
- Are these activities in-house or outsourced?
|
||||
- Production, problem-solving, platform/network activities?
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Key Resources**
|
||||
- What resources are necessary to create value?
|
||||
- Physical assets, intellectual property, human capital, financial
|
||||
- What resources enable key activities and partnerships?
|
||||
- What's the minimum viable resource set?
|
||||
|
||||
### Center: The Value Proposition
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Value Propositions**
|
||||
- What value do we deliver to customers?
|
||||
- Which customer problems do we solve?
|
||||
- What needs are satisfied?
|
||||
- What products/services address each segment?
|
||||
- Quantitative (price, speed, quality) vs. qualitative (design, status)
|
||||
|
||||
### Right Side: Delivering Value
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Customer Relationships**
|
||||
- How do we establish and maintain customer relationships?
|
||||
- Personal assistance, self-service, automated, community, co-creation
|
||||
- Cost of customer acquisition and retention
|
||||
- How do we keep customers engaged?
|
||||
|
||||
**6. Channels**
|
||||
- How do customers discover and access the value?
|
||||
- Awareness: How do customers learn about us?
|
||||
- Purchase: How do they buy?
|
||||
- Delivery: How is value delivered?
|
||||
- After-sales: How do we support customers?
|
||||
- Direct vs. indirect, owned vs. partner channels
|
||||
|
||||
**7. Customer Segments**
|
||||
- Who are the key customer segments?
|
||||
- Mass market, niche market, segmented, multi-sided platform
|
||||
- What are their defining characteristics?
|
||||
- Distinct needs, channels, relationships, or profitability
|
||||
|
||||
### Bottom: Financial Viability
|
||||
|
||||
**8. Cost Structure**
|
||||
- What are the most important costs?
|
||||
- Fixed vs. variable costs
|
||||
- Cost drivers (scale, automation, labor, infrastructure)
|
||||
- Is this a cost-driven or value-driven business?
|
||||
|
||||
**9. Revenue Streams**
|
||||
- How does the business make money?
|
||||
- Per customer, per transaction, subscription, licensing, rents
|
||||
- Pricing mechanisms (fixed, dynamic, value-based)
|
||||
- Customer lifetime value and unit economics
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Identify and profile customer segments
|
||||
2. Define the core value proposition(s)
|
||||
3. Map customer relationships and channels
|
||||
4. List key activities and resources
|
||||
5. Identify key partners
|
||||
6. Outline cost structure
|
||||
7. Define revenue streams
|
||||
8. Ensure all 9 blocks align and support each other
|
||||
9. Test economic viability (LTV > 3x CAC)
|
||||
10. Identify key assumptions and risks
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain Context
|
||||
|
||||
**BMC vs Lean Canvas vs Startup Canvas**: Business Model Canvas (9 blocks, balanced, works for any business). Lean Canvas (startup-focused, problem-first, replaces Partners/Activities/Resources with Problem/Solution/Unfair Advantage). **Startup Canvas** separates strategy (9 sections from the Product Strategy Canvas) from business model (Cost Structure & Revenue Streams). Note: most popular canvas models miss the "Can't/Won't" defensibility question — consider adding it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- The Business Model Canvas provides a holistic view of how value flows through the organization
|
||||
- Each block should reinforce and support the others
|
||||
- Strong business models have clear, defensible value propositions
|
||||
- Financial sustainability requires revenue to exceed costs at scale
|
||||
- Use this to identify opportunities for innovation and optimization
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Business Model Canvas Examples: Google Maps, Airbnb, Uber](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/business-model-canvas-examples)
|
||||
- [Startup Canvas: Product Strategy and a Business Model for a New Product](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/startup-canvas)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: lean-canvas
|
||||
description: "Generate a Lean Canvas business model with sections for problem, solution, metrics, cost structure, UVP, unfair advantage, channels, segments, and revenue. Triggers: lean canvas, startup canvas, business hypothesis."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Lean Canvas
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: lean-canvas
|
||||
- **Description**: Generate a Lean Canvas business model with detailed sections for problem, solution, metrics, cost structure, UVP, unfair advantage, channels, segments, and revenue.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: lean canvas, startup canvas, lean model, business hypothesis
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a business model strategist designing a Lean Canvas for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to create a comprehensive Lean Canvas that outlines the business hypothesis and key business model assumptions for the product.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product or feature description
|
||||
- Target customer segment(s)
|
||||
- Market context and problem space
|
||||
- Any available metrics or business constraints
|
||||
|
||||
## Lean Canvas Template
|
||||
|
||||
### Section 1: Product Definition
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Problem**
|
||||
- Top 3 customer problems or needs
|
||||
- Customer pains and frustrations
|
||||
- Current unsatisfactory solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Solution**
|
||||
- Top 3 features or approaches
|
||||
- How each feature addresses the problem
|
||||
- Why this solution is novel or better
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Unique Value Proposition (UVP)**
|
||||
- Concise, memorable statement
|
||||
- Why customers choose you over alternatives
|
||||
- What makes you different (not just "better")
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Unfair Advantage**
|
||||
- What defensibility exists?
|
||||
- Barriers to competition (network effects, brand, IP, switching costs)
|
||||
- What competitors can't easily replicate
|
||||
|
||||
### Section 2: Market & Traction
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Customer Segments**
|
||||
- Who is the target customer?
|
||||
- Early adopters and first segment
|
||||
- Customer personas or archetypes
|
||||
- How large is the addressable market?
|
||||
|
||||
**6. Channels**
|
||||
- How do you reach customers?
|
||||
- Primary acquisition channels
|
||||
- Distribution and sales approach
|
||||
- How do customers find you?
|
||||
|
||||
**7. Revenue Streams**
|
||||
- How do you make money?
|
||||
- Pricing model or revenue per customer
|
||||
- Customer lifetime value (LTV)
|
||||
- Revenue growth assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
### Section 3: Economics & Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**8. Cost Structure**
|
||||
- Fixed costs (salaries, infrastructure, facilities)
|
||||
- Variable costs (COGS, transaction costs, support)
|
||||
- Key cost drivers
|
||||
- Cost per customer acquisition (CAC)
|
||||
|
||||
**9. Key Metrics**
|
||||
- Activation: How do users get value quickly?
|
||||
- Retention: How many users stick around?
|
||||
- Revenue: How do we measure financial success?
|
||||
- North Star metric for the business
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Define the core problem(s) being solved
|
||||
2. Outline 2-3 solution approaches
|
||||
3. Craft a compelling UVP
|
||||
4. Identify what creates competitive advantage
|
||||
5. Target 1-2 customer segments
|
||||
6. Map acquisition channels
|
||||
7. Define revenue model and pricing
|
||||
8. Estimate cost structure
|
||||
9. Identify 3-5 critical metrics to track
|
||||
10. Surface key assumptions and hypotheses
|
||||
11. Suggest validation experiments (landing page, interviews, MVP)
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain Context
|
||||
|
||||
Lean Canvas mixes strategy and business model into one artifact. **Startup Canvas** separates them: 9 strategy sections (from the Product Strategy Canvas) + Cost Structure & Revenue Streams. Consider which structure best fits the user's needs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- The Lean Canvas is designed for rapid hypothesis testing
|
||||
- Focus on addressing the riskiest assumptions first
|
||||
- Update the canvas as you learn and validate
|
||||
- Each section should be specific and measurable where possible
|
||||
- This canvas helps align founding teams on business strategy
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Startup Canvas: Product Strategy and a Business Model for a New Product](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/startup-canvas)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: monetization-strategy
|
||||
description: "Brainstorm 3-5 monetization strategies with audience fit, risks, and validation experiments. Use when exploring revenue models or pricing strategies. Triggers: monetization strategy, revenue model, pricing strategy, how to monetize."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Monetization Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: monetization-strategy
|
||||
- **Description**: Brainstorm 3-5 monetization strategies with audience fit, risks, and validation experiments. Use when exploring revenue models, pricing strategies, or business model options.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: monetization strategy, revenue model, pricing strategy, how to monetize, make money
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are an experienced business model strategist brainstorming monetization strategies for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to develop 3-5 distinct monetization approaches that could work for the product or feature, evaluate fit with the target market, and outline low-effort validation experiments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product or feature description
|
||||
- Target market segment(s) and customer profile
|
||||
- Current willingness to pay or budget constraints
|
||||
- Competitive monetization approaches
|
||||
- Company priorities (revenue growth, user growth, profitability)
|
||||
|
||||
## Monetization Framework
|
||||
|
||||
For each strategy, include:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Strategy Name & Description
|
||||
- What is the monetization model?
|
||||
- How does it work for this product?
|
||||
- Who pays and what do they get?
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. How It Works
|
||||
- Revenue model and pricing mechanics
|
||||
- Value exchange between company and customer
|
||||
- Payment frequency and transaction size
|
||||
- Lifecycle and retention mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Audience Fit
|
||||
- Why does this resonate with your target customer?
|
||||
- How does it align with customer needs and preferences?
|
||||
- What problems does it solve for the customer?
|
||||
- Addressable market size and revenue potential
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Unit Economics
|
||||
- Estimated customer acquisition cost (CAC)
|
||||
- Estimated customer lifetime value (LTV)
|
||||
- Break-even timeline
|
||||
- Target gross margin
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Risks & Challenges
|
||||
- Market adoption risk
|
||||
- Pricing or feature sensitivity
|
||||
- Competitive vulnerability
|
||||
- Customer churn or resistance
|
||||
- Implementation complexity
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Competitive Position
|
||||
- How do competitors monetize?
|
||||
- What makes your approach differentiated?
|
||||
- Barriers to customer switching
|
||||
- Defense against competitive pricing
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Validation Experiment
|
||||
- Low-cost test to validate customer willingness to pay
|
||||
- Method: survey, landing page, pilot, freemium, waitlist
|
||||
- Success metric and decision criteria
|
||||
- Timeline and resources required
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Monetization Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Freemium (Free Base + Paid Premium)
|
||||
- **How**: Free core features, premium advanced features behind paywall
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for high-volume, low-touch products (design tools, productivity, communication)
|
||||
- **Risks**: Low conversion rates (typically 1-5%), features must be clear to justify upgrade
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Launch freemium version, track conversion rate, gather upgrade feedback
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Subscription (Recurring Monthly/Annual)
|
||||
- **How**: Recurring charge for ongoing access and updates
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for products with continuous value (software, platforms, services)
|
||||
- **Risks**: Customer churn, cannibalization from annual vs. monthly
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Offer subscription to beta customers, measure churn rate and NPS
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Usage-Based (Pay Per Use)
|
||||
- **How**: Customers pay based on usage volume (API calls, storage, transactions)
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for B2B platforms, APIs, services with variable customer needs
|
||||
- **Risks**: Unpredictable revenue, customer cost anxiety, usage optimization by customers
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Implement usage tracking, pilot with 5-10 beta customers, model revenue
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Enterprise/Seat-Based (Per User/Seat)
|
||||
- **How**: Price per user, department, or seat using the product
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for B2B SaaS with team/organization adoption
|
||||
- **Risks**: Sales complexity, contract length, implementation overhead
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Conduct 5-10 customer interviews, validate pricing per seat, define support model
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. One-Time Purchase (Buy Once)
|
||||
- **How**: Single upfront purchase for permanent or one-time license
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for niche products, tools, or templates (not ongoing services)
|
||||
- **Risks**: Revenue concentration in launch period, no recurring revenue, updates/support questions
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Launch limited offering, track conversion and customer satisfaction
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Marketplace/Transaction Fee
|
||||
- **How**: Take a percentage or fixed fee from transactions between buyers and sellers
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for platforms connecting supply and demand
|
||||
- **Risks**: Market liquidity chicken-and-egg problem, trust and safety, competitive pressure
|
||||
- **Experiment**: MVP with limited sellers, offer free period to drive initial supply, model unit economics
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Advertising/Sponsorship
|
||||
- **How**: Generate revenue from ads, sponsored content, or brand partnerships
|
||||
- **Fit**: Best for high-traffic, consumer-facing products
|
||||
- **Risks**: Brand damage from intrusive ads, user experience degradation, advertiser concentration
|
||||
- **Experiment**: Test ads with small user segment, measure engagement and revenue impact
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Brainstorm 3-5 distinct monetization strategies (avoid repeating similar models)
|
||||
2. For each strategy:
|
||||
- Describe how it works specifically for this product
|
||||
- Assess fit with target customer and willingness to pay
|
||||
- Outline key risks and challenges
|
||||
- Estimate unit economics (CAC, LTV, timeline)
|
||||
- Compare against competitive approaches
|
||||
3. For each strategy, design a low-effort validation experiment
|
||||
4. Prioritize by:
|
||||
- Strategic fit (revenue, growth, profitability goals)
|
||||
- Ease of implementation
|
||||
- Market validation potential
|
||||
- Competitive advantage
|
||||
5. Recommend 1-2 strategies to test first
|
||||
6. Create testing roadmap and success criteria
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Considerations
|
||||
- **Revenue Goals**: How much revenue is needed? By when?
|
||||
- **Growth Goals**: Does monetization need to support user growth?
|
||||
- **Market Dynamics**: Are customers ready to pay? For what?
|
||||
- **Competitive Pressure**: How will competitors respond?
|
||||
- **Unit Economics**: What gross margin is required for viability?
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Best monetization strategies align with customer value and willingness to pay
|
||||
- Test early and often; don't wait for perfect product to validate pricing
|
||||
- Most products use hybrid models (e.g., freemium + upgrade, subscription + marketplace fees)
|
||||
- Pricing can be changed; customer relationships are harder to rebuild
|
||||
- Monitor competitors but don't race to the bottom on price
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Product Pricing Strategies 101](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-pricing-strategies-101)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: pestle-analysis
|
||||
description: "Perform a PESTLE analysis covering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. Use for macro-environment assessment or strategic planning. Triggers: PESTLE analysis, macro environment, external factors."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# PESTLE Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: pestle-analysis
|
||||
- **Description**: Perform a PESTLE analysis covering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. Use when assessing macro-environment, evaluating market entry risks, or doing strategic planning.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: PESTLE analysis, macro environment, market environment, external factors analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a strategic analyst conducting a PESTLE analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to evaluate the macro-environmental factors that could impact product strategy, market entry, or business viability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Industry and market context
|
||||
- Geographic market or region(s)
|
||||
- Product or business type
|
||||
- Current strategic challenges or questions
|
||||
- Any known regulatory or market changes
|
||||
|
||||
## PESTLE Analysis Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Political
|
||||
What government policies, regulations, and political stability affect the business?
|
||||
|
||||
- Government policies and incentives
|
||||
- Tax regulations and tariffs
|
||||
- Political stability and risk
|
||||
- Government spending and subsidies
|
||||
- Trade agreements and regulations
|
||||
- Licensing and permits required
|
||||
- Government relationships and lobbying needs
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Economic
|
||||
What economic conditions and financial factors matter?
|
||||
|
||||
- Economic growth and GDP trends
|
||||
- Interest rates and inflation
|
||||
- Currency exchange rates
|
||||
- Consumer spending and confidence
|
||||
- Employment and labor costs
|
||||
- Disposable income trends
|
||||
- Access to financing and capital
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Social
|
||||
What demographic and cultural trends shape the market?
|
||||
|
||||
- Population demographics and trends
|
||||
- Cultural attitudes and values
|
||||
- Consumer lifestyle and behaviors
|
||||
- Education and skills availability
|
||||
- Health and wellness trends
|
||||
- Social media and digital adoption
|
||||
- Diversity and inclusion preferences
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Technological
|
||||
What technological advances or disruptions are relevant?
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging technologies (AI, blockchain, cloud, etc.)
|
||||
- Digital transformation trends
|
||||
- Cybersecurity and data privacy requirements
|
||||
- Automation and robotics
|
||||
- Internet of Things (IoT) and connectivity
|
||||
- Research and development capabilities
|
||||
- Technology adoption rates and digital literacy
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Legal
|
||||
What laws, regulations, and compliance requirements apply?
|
||||
|
||||
- Data protection and privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)
|
||||
- Employment and labor laws
|
||||
- Intellectual property and patent laws
|
||||
- Consumer protection laws
|
||||
- Industry-specific regulations
|
||||
- Compliance costs and audit requirements
|
||||
- Liability and insurance requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Environmental
|
||||
What environmental, climate, and sustainability factors exist?
|
||||
|
||||
- Climate change and environmental regulations
|
||||
- Carbon emissions and sustainability requirements
|
||||
- Natural resource availability and scarcity
|
||||
- Waste management and circular economy trends
|
||||
- Renewable energy adoption
|
||||
- ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) expectations
|
||||
- Green certification and eco-friendly standards
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. For each PESTLE category, identify 3-5 relevant factors
|
||||
2. Assess impact on product/business (High, Medium, Low)
|
||||
3. Assess probability or likelihood (High, Medium, Low)
|
||||
4. Prioritize factors by impact x probability
|
||||
5. Develop strategic responses:
|
||||
- Which factors are opportunities to leverage?
|
||||
- Which factors are threats to mitigate or avoid?
|
||||
- Which factors require compliance or adaptation?
|
||||
6. Identify key metrics or leading indicators to monitor
|
||||
7. Build contingency plans for high-impact factors
|
||||
8. Document assumptions and unknowns requiring research
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Applications
|
||||
- Market entry assessment: Is this market viable to enter?
|
||||
- Risk assessment: What macro risks could derail our strategy?
|
||||
- Opportunity identification: What external shifts create new possibilities?
|
||||
- Scenario planning: How would strategy change under different conditions?
|
||||
- Regulatory roadmap: What compliance needs must we plan for?
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- PESTLE is complementary to SWOT (macro vs. micro analysis)
|
||||
- Some factors span multiple categories (e.g., regulations affect legal, political, and economic)
|
||||
- Geographic and industry context matter significantly
|
||||
- Trends evolve; re-assess PESTLE annually or when markets shift
|
||||
- Use PESTLE early in strategy development to avoid blind spots
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: porters-five-forces
|
||||
description: "Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants. Triggers: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Porter's Five Forces
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: porters-five-forces
|
||||
- **Description**: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Industry or market definition
|
||||
- Current competitors and competitive positioning
|
||||
- Supplier and customer landscape
|
||||
- Potential substitutes and new entrants
|
||||
- Product or service specifics
|
||||
|
||||
## Porter's Five Forces Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)
|
||||
The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Rivalry When:**
|
||||
- Many competitors of similar size and strength
|
||||
- Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
|
||||
- Low product differentiation (commoditized)
|
||||
- High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
|
||||
- Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
|
||||
- Price competition is intense
|
||||
- Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
|
||||
- Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Rivalry When:**
|
||||
- Few competitors
|
||||
- High growth market
|
||||
- High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
|
||||
- Low fixed costs
|
||||
- Low switching costs for competitors
|
||||
- Industry leader has clear dominance
|
||||
- Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
|
||||
- Define defensible competitive advantages
|
||||
- Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
|
||||
- Invest in differentiation or cost leadership
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)
|
||||
The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Supplier Power When:**
|
||||
- Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
|
||||
- Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
|
||||
- Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
|
||||
- Suppliers' product is critical or unique
|
||||
- Suppliers have strong bargaining position
|
||||
- No substitutes for supplier offerings
|
||||
- Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Supplier Power When:**
|
||||
- Many suppliers available
|
||||
- Low switching costs
|
||||
- Suppliers depend on your business
|
||||
- Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
|
||||
- Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
|
||||
- Available substitutes for supplier offerings
|
||||
- You have significant bargaining leverage
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
|
||||
- Build strong supplier relationships
|
||||
- Consider vertical integration or alternatives
|
||||
- Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
|
||||
- Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)
|
||||
The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Buyer Power When:**
|
||||
- Few large customers (concentrated demand)
|
||||
- Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
|
||||
- Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
|
||||
- Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
|
||||
- Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
|
||||
- Buyers have full information about alternatives
|
||||
- Customers can bypass you entirely
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Buyer Power When:**
|
||||
- Many fragmented customers
|
||||
- High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
|
||||
- High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
|
||||
- Customers depend on your product
|
||||
- You have strong brand or reputation
|
||||
- Switching to alternatives involves risk
|
||||
- Customers lack information about alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
|
||||
- Create switching costs through integration
|
||||
- Invest in brand and differentiation
|
||||
- Develop customer success programs
|
||||
- Create network effects or communities
|
||||
- Segment customers by willingness to pay
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)
|
||||
The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Threat When:**
|
||||
- Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
|
||||
- Substitutes have similar performance or better value
|
||||
- Switching costs to substitutes are low
|
||||
- Customers are willing to try alternatives
|
||||
- Substitutes are improving faster than your product
|
||||
- Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
|
||||
- Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Threat When:**
|
||||
- No good substitutes exist
|
||||
- Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
|
||||
- Switching costs are high
|
||||
- Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
|
||||
- Customer preference and loyalty are strong
|
||||
- Barrier to substitute entry are high
|
||||
- Your product solves the problem uniquely
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
|
||||
- Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
|
||||
- Invest in product innovation and improvement
|
||||
- Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
|
||||
- Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
|
||||
- Defend through brand, service, or convenience
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)
|
||||
The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Threat When:**
|
||||
- Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
|
||||
- Attractive industry margins and growth
|
||||
- Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
|
||||
- Distribution or channel access is available
|
||||
- Economies of scale are limited
|
||||
- Network effects are weak or absent
|
||||
- Regulation is permissive
|
||||
- New technologies enable disruption
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Threat When:**
|
||||
- High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
|
||||
- Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
|
||||
- Strong network effects or switching costs
|
||||
- Brand loyalty is high
|
||||
- Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
|
||||
- Economies of scale create cost advantage
|
||||
- Control of critical resources or distribution
|
||||
- Retaliation by incumbents is credible
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
|
||||
- Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
|
||||
- Create switching costs and customer lock-in
|
||||
- Invest in brand and customer relationships
|
||||
- Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
|
||||
- Build alliances and control key resources
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
|
||||
2. Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
|
||||
3. For each force, identify:
|
||||
- Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
|
||||
- Key players or dynamics
|
||||
- Implications for profitability
|
||||
4. Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
|
||||
5. Develop strategic responses:
|
||||
- How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
|
||||
- How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
|
||||
6. Identify competitive positioning opportunities
|
||||
7. Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Industry Attractiveness
|
||||
- **Attractive**: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
|
||||
- **Unattractive**: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
|
||||
- **Moderate**: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
|
||||
- Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
|
||||
- Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
|
||||
- Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
|
||||
- Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: pricing-strategy
|
||||
description: "Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticity considerations. Use when setting prices, evaluating pricing models, preparing for a pricing change, or analyzing competitive pricing. Triggers: pricing strategy, pricing model, how to price, pricing analysis, willingness to pay, price point, freemium vs paid."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pricing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Design a pricing strategy grounded in value delivery, competitive positioning, and willingness to pay.
|
||||
|
||||
### Context
|
||||
|
||||
You are developing a pricing strategy for **$ARGUMENTS**.
|
||||
|
||||
If the user provides files (competitor pricing, survey data, financial models, or usage data), read them first. Use web search to research competitor pricing if needed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Understand the value delivered**:
|
||||
- What is the core value proposition?
|
||||
- What is the customer's alternative (and its cost)?
|
||||
- What quantifiable outcomes does the product deliver? (time saved, revenue gained, cost reduced)
|
||||
- What is the customer's willingness to pay based on that value?
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Evaluate pricing models** — recommend the best fit:
|
||||
|
||||
| Model | Best For | Example |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Flat-rate** | Simple products, predictable costs | Basecamp ($99/mo flat) |
|
||||
| **Per-seat** | Collaboration tools, team products | Slack, Figma |
|
||||
| **Usage-based** | Infrastructure, API products | AWS, Twilio |
|
||||
| **Tiered** | Products with distinct user segments | Most SaaS (Free/Pro/Enterprise) |
|
||||
| **Freemium** | Products with viral/network effects | Spotify, Notion |
|
||||
| **Freemium + usage** | Platform products | Vercel, OpenAI API |
|
||||
| **Value-based** | High-impact enterprise tools | Salesforce, Palantir |
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Analyze competitive pricing**:
|
||||
- Map competitor pricing tiers and what's included
|
||||
- Identify where your product sits (premium, mid-market, budget)
|
||||
- Find pricing gaps or opportunities
|
||||
- Note any industry pricing conventions
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Design the pricing structure**:
|
||||
- **Tiers**: Define 2-4 tiers with clear differentiation
|
||||
- **Feature gating**: Which features go in which tier? (Use value metrics, not arbitrary limits)
|
||||
- **Value metric**: What unit do you charge on? (users, events, storage, API calls)
|
||||
- **Anchor pricing**: Set the most popular tier to feel like the obvious choice
|
||||
- **Annual discount**: Typically 15-20% off monthly pricing
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Estimate price sensitivity**:
|
||||
- Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (if survey data available):
|
||||
- Too cheap → quality concerns
|
||||
- Cheap → good value
|
||||
- Expensive → starting to hesitate
|
||||
- Too expensive → won't buy
|
||||
- Alternatively, estimate based on competitor pricing and value delivered
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Plan pricing experiments**:
|
||||
- A/B test pricing pages (different price points, tier names, feature bundles)
|
||||
- Founder-led sales conversations to test willingness to pay
|
||||
- Landing page tests with different price anchors
|
||||
- Cohort analysis of conversion rates by price point
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Output a pricing recommendation**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Recommended Model: [Model type]
|
||||
Value Metric: [What you charge on]
|
||||
|
||||
| Tier | Price | Target Segment | Key Features | Positioning |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
||||
Key Assumptions:
|
||||
- [Assumption] → [How to test]
|
||||
|
||||
Risks:
|
||||
- [Risk] → [Mitigation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Think step by step. Save as markdown. Flag any assumptions that need validation before launch.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Product Pricing Strategies 101](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-pricing-strategies-101)
|
||||
- [The AI Product Pricing Masterclass: OpenAI Product Lead on Why SaaS Pricing Fails in AI (and How to Fix It)](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/ai-product-pricing) (video course)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: product-strategy
|
||||
description: "Generate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas covering vision, segments, costs, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibility. Triggers: product strategy, strategy canvas, strategic plan."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Product Strategy Canvas
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: product-strategy
|
||||
- **Description**: Generate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas. Covers vision, market segments, costs, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibility.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: product strategy, strategy canvas, strategic plan, product strategy document
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are an experienced product strategist developing a comprehensive product strategy for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to create a detailed Product Strategy Canvas that outlines how the product will compete, win, and grow in the market.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product description and current positioning
|
||||
- Market context, competitors, and customer insights
|
||||
- Company resources, constraints, and priorities
|
||||
- Any relevant business or market data
|
||||
|
||||
## Product Strategy Canvas Template
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Vision
|
||||
- How can we inspire people?
|
||||
- What are we aspiring to achieve?
|
||||
- What values do we uphold?
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Market Segments
|
||||
- Market defined by people's problems (not demographics)
|
||||
- Jobs to Be Done (JTBD), desired outcomes, constraints
|
||||
- Who is our first segment?
|
||||
- Why this segment first?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Relative Costs
|
||||
- Do we optimize for low cost (like Southwest Airlines)?
|
||||
- Or do we emphasize unique value (like Starbucks)?
|
||||
- What's our cost position relative to competitors?
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Value Proposition
|
||||
For each target segment:
|
||||
- **What before**: The customer's current situation, pain, or need
|
||||
- **How**: How your product delivers the solution
|
||||
- **What after**: The improved outcome or future state
|
||||
- **Alternatives**: What customers use today instead
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Trade-offs
|
||||
- What will we NOT do?
|
||||
- What features or markets are out of scope?
|
||||
- How does saying "no" create focus and amplify our value?
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Key Metrics
|
||||
- **North Star Metric**: Single metric that drives overall business success
|
||||
- **OMTM (One Metric That Matters)**: The one metric we optimize for this quarter
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Growth
|
||||
- Sales-Led Growth or Product-Led Growth?
|
||||
- Primary acquisition channels
|
||||
- How do we scale?
|
||||
- What's our unit economics?
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Capabilities
|
||||
- What competencies and resources do we need?
|
||||
- What do we build vs. partner for?
|
||||
- What capabilities must we develop to win?
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Can't/Won't
|
||||
- Why can't competitors easily copy this?
|
||||
- What defensibility do we have (network effects, switching costs, IP)?
|
||||
- What barriers to entry exist for new competitors?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Define the vision and aspirational impact
|
||||
2. Identify 2-3 target market segments with their JTBD
|
||||
3. Establish cost positioning (low cost vs. premium value)
|
||||
4. Develop value propositions for each segment
|
||||
5. List explicit trade-offs (what we won't do)
|
||||
6. Set North Star and quarterly OMTM
|
||||
7. Outline growth strategy and channels
|
||||
8. Document required capabilities and partnerships
|
||||
9. Explain defensibility and barriers to competition
|
||||
10. Validate strategy coherence: ensure elements reinforce each other
|
||||
11. Surface critical hypotheses that must be true for success
|
||||
12. Suggest low-effort experiments to test key assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Ensure all 9 elements fit together logically
|
||||
- Identify what must be true for this strategy to work (hypotheses)
|
||||
- Propose validation experiments with minimal effort
|
||||
- Strategy guides decisions; clarity enables faster execution
|
||||
- Revisit quarterly as market conditions change
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Templates
|
||||
|
||||
- [Product Strategy Canvas (PPTX)](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xRBqSOISvAKzwM_z5tC8fiuO5O2YhboB/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111307342557889008106&rtpof=true&sd=true)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Product Strategy Examples: Google Maps, Netflix, OpenAI](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-strategy-examples)
|
||||
- [Product Vision vs Strategy vs Objectives vs Roadmap: The Advanced Edition](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-vision-strategy-goals-and)
|
||||
- [Product Model First Principles: Product Team and Product Strategy In Depth](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-model-first-principles-transformed-cagan)
|
||||
- [Introducing the Product Strategy Canvas](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/new-product-strategy-canvas)
|
||||
- [Business Outcomes vs Product Outcomes vs Customer Outcomes](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/business-outcomes-vs-product-outcomes)
|
||||
- [From Strategy to Objectives Masterclass](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-vision-strategy-objectives-course) (video course)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: product-vision
|
||||
description: "Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams. Use when defining or refining product vision. Triggers: product vision, vision statement, create vision, inspiring vision."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Product Vision
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: product-vision
|
||||
- **Description**: Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision. Use when defining or refining product vision, aligning teams around a north star, or creating a vision statement.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: product vision, vision statement, create vision, inspiring vision, north star vision
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain Context
|
||||
|
||||
A product **vision** answers: "How can we inspire people? What are we aspiring to achieve? What values do we uphold?" Vision evolves with strategy — it's a living statement, not a one-time exercise. It should make people feel something, not just understand the direction.
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a veteran product leader developing a compelling product vision.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to brainstorm a product vision for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Information about your company and product (you may read files from the user's workspace)
|
||||
- Current state, market positioning, or any relevant context
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
Provide a vision statement that is:
|
||||
1. **Inspiring** - Motivates teams to wake up and commit to the goal
|
||||
2. **Achievable** - Realistic based on resources, market, and capabilities
|
||||
3. **Emotional** - Creates meaning and connection
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
1. Review provided company and product information
|
||||
2. Identify the core problem being solved
|
||||
3. Envision the ideal future state for customers and the company
|
||||
4. Draft multiple vision options (3-5 variations)
|
||||
5. Select the strongest vision and briefly explain your rationale
|
||||
6. Highlight how this vision aligns with company values and market opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- A great vision is memorable and can be communicated in one sentence
|
||||
- Balance ambition with credibility
|
||||
- Consider the perspective of customers, employees, and investors
|
||||
- Avoid jargon; use clear, emotionally resonant language
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Product Vision vs Strategy vs Objectives vs Roadmap: The Advanced Edition](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-vision-strategy-goals-and)
|
||||
- [Introducing the Product Strategy Canvas](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/new-product-strategy-canvas)
|
||||
- [From Strategy to Objectives Masterclass](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-vision-strategy-objectives-course) (video course)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: swot-analysis
|
||||
description: "Perform a detailed SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations. Triggers: SWOT analysis, strengths weaknesses, strategic assessment."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# SWOT Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: swot-analysis
|
||||
- **Description**: Perform a detailed SWOT analysis for a product. Identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: SWOT analysis, strengths weaknesses, SWOT matrix, strategic assessment
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a strategic analyst conducting a SWOT analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to thoroughly evaluate the internal and external factors that will impact product success and competitive positioning.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product description and current state
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and market context
|
||||
- Company capabilities, resources, and constraints
|
||||
- Market trends and industry dynamics
|
||||
- Customer feedback or usage data (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
## SWOT Analysis Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Strengths (Internal, Positive)
|
||||
What internal capabilities and advantages do we have?
|
||||
|
||||
- Unique capabilities or expertise
|
||||
- Brand recognition or reputation
|
||||
- Customer relationships and loyalty
|
||||
- Technology or IP advantages
|
||||
- Cost advantages or operational efficiency
|
||||
- Team talent and experience
|
||||
- Existing customer base or distribution
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Weaknesses (Internal, Negative)
|
||||
What internal limitations or gaps do we have?
|
||||
|
||||
- Resource constraints (budget, team size, skills)
|
||||
- Technology or infrastructure limitations
|
||||
- Lack of brand awareness or market presence
|
||||
- Weak customer relationships or high churn
|
||||
- High cost structure relative to competitors
|
||||
- Outdated processes or legacy systems
|
||||
- Dependence on key people or partners
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Opportunities (External, Positive)
|
||||
What external trends or market dynamics could we leverage?
|
||||
|
||||
- Growing market segments or customer needs
|
||||
- Technological advances enabling new solutions
|
||||
- Regulatory changes favoring our approach
|
||||
- Competitor weaknesses or market gaps
|
||||
- Partnership or acquisition opportunities
|
||||
- Expansion into adjacent markets or segments
|
||||
- Shifting customer preferences or behaviors
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Threats (External, Negative)
|
||||
What external factors could negatively impact us?
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging or stronger competitors
|
||||
- Changing customer preferences or needs
|
||||
- Technological disruption or obsolescence
|
||||
- Regulatory changes or compliance risks
|
||||
- Economic downturns or market contraction
|
||||
- Supply chain disruptions
|
||||
- Supplier or partner consolidation
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Identify 5-7 strengths (be honest about competitive advantages)
|
||||
2. List 5-7 weaknesses (avoid minimizing; focus on addressable gaps)
|
||||
3. Map 5-7 opportunities (prioritize by market size and alignment)
|
||||
4. Flag 5-7 threats (assess probability and impact)
|
||||
5. Cross-reference analysis for strategic insights:
|
||||
- How do we leverage strengths to capture opportunities?
|
||||
- How do we shore up weaknesses to mitigate threats?
|
||||
- Which opportunities can overcome weaknesses?
|
||||
- Which threats could exploit weaknesses?
|
||||
6. Develop 3-5 strategic recommendations
|
||||
7. Prioritize actions and owners
|
||||
8. Identify metrics to track progress
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Applications
|
||||
- **Build**: Double down on strengths + opportunities
|
||||
- **Defend**: Fortify weaknesses + mitigate threats
|
||||
- **Pivot**: Explore opportunities that change the competitive dynamic
|
||||
- **Exit**: If too many threats and weak competitive position
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- SWOT is internal to external assessment
|
||||
- Context matters: compare against competitors and industry standards
|
||||
- Update SWOT quarterly or when market conditions change
|
||||
- Use SWOT to inform product roadmap, partnerships, and resource allocation
|
||||
- Opportunities and threats should consider both current and emerging dynamics
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: value-proposition
|
||||
description: "Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template (Who, Why, What before, How, What after, Alternatives). Triggers: value proposition, value prop, customer value, JTBD value."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Value Proposition
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: value-proposition
|
||||
- **Description**: Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part template with JTBD framing. Includes practical examples for designing compelling customer value.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: value proposition, value prop, customer value, JTBD value, value map
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a product strategist designing a clear value proposition for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to develop a comprehensive value proposition that articulates the customer value delivered by the product.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Product description and features
|
||||
- Target customer segment and their problems
|
||||
- Competitive alternatives and current solutions
|
||||
- Customer insights or market data
|
||||
|
||||
## Value Proposition Template
|
||||
|
||||
### 6-Part Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Who**
|
||||
- Who is this value proposition for?
|
||||
- What customer segment are we addressing?
|
||||
- What are their characteristics and constraints?
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Why (Problem)**
|
||||
- What is the customer's core problem or need?
|
||||
- What's the Job to Be Done (JTBD)?
|
||||
- What desired outcomes are they trying to achieve?
|
||||
|
||||
**3. What Before**
|
||||
- What is the customer's current situation?
|
||||
- What are they using today to solve this problem?
|
||||
- What friction or pain exists in the current approach?
|
||||
|
||||
**4. How (Solution)**
|
||||
- How does the product solve the problem?
|
||||
- What specific features or capabilities deliver value?
|
||||
- Why is this solution better than alternatives?
|
||||
|
||||
**5. What After**
|
||||
- What is the improved outcome or future state?
|
||||
- How does the customer's life/work change?
|
||||
- What becomes possible that wasn't before?
|
||||
|
||||
**6. Alternatives**
|
||||
- What other solutions could customers use?
|
||||
- Why would they choose us instead?
|
||||
- What's the switching cost or friction from alternatives?
|
||||
|
||||
## Example: Canva
|
||||
- **Who**: Non-designers who need to create marketing graphics
|
||||
- **Why**: They need professional-looking designs but can't hire designers or use complex tools
|
||||
- **What Before**: Using PowerPoint, Photoshop (too complex), or hiring expensive designers
|
||||
- **How**: Drag-and-drop templates, built-in design elements, AI design assistance, intuitive interface
|
||||
- **What After**: Create professional designs in minutes, launch campaigns faster, save design costs
|
||||
- **Alternatives**: Photoshop (complex), Fiverr (slow, expensive), Canva competitors (fewer templates, harder UX)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Identify and profile the target customer segment
|
||||
2. Define the core problem and JTBD
|
||||
3. Describe the current state and friction points
|
||||
4. Articulate how the product solves the problem
|
||||
5. Envision the improved outcome
|
||||
6. Compare against competitive alternatives
|
||||
7. Create a concise value prop statement (1-2 sentences)
|
||||
8. Develop a positioning statement for marketing use
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework focuses on the progress the customer is trying to make, not demographics
|
||||
- Value propositions are segment-specific; you may have different value props for different customer groups
|
||||
- The stronger your value prop, the easier marketing, sales, and product decisions become
|
||||
- Test value props with real customers before finalizing
|
||||
- Use a **Value Curve** (Blue Ocean Strategy) to visually compare your offering against competitors across key factors
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Templates
|
||||
|
||||
- [Value Proposition Template (PPTX)](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RXH1Udj71aXQJzGeqYSOStnfQ-6dNz14/edit?slide=id.g2a98aeea3b1_0_247#slide=id.g2a98aeea3b1_0_247)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [How to Design a Value Proposition Customers Can't Resist?](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-design-value-proposition-template)
|
||||
- [How to Achieve Product-Market Fit? Part I: Market and Value Proposition](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-achieve-the-product-market)
|
||||
- [Jobs-to-be-Done Masterclass with Tony Ulwick and Sabeen Sattar](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/jobs-to-be-done-masterclass-with) (video course)
|
||||
- [Product Innovation Masterclass](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/product-innovation-masterclass) (video course)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user